Back to Boston.com homepage Arts | Entertainment Boston Globe Online Cars.com BostonWorks Real Estate Boston.com Sports digitalMass Travel The Boston Globe Spotlight Investigation Boston.com Abuse in the Catholic Church
HomePredator priestsScandal and coverupThe victimsThe financial costOpinion
Cardinal Law and the laityThe church's responseThe clergyInvestigations and lawsuits
Interactive2002 scandal overviewParish mapExtrasArchivesDocumentsAbout this site
 Latest coverage

March 11
Victims' lawyer to sue Dupre

March 6
Suit accuses insurer of fraud

March 5
Charges against bishop eyed

March 1
Activists seek sex abuse panel

February 26
Alleged victim to aid probe

February 13
Springfield probe is sought

January 7, 2004
Agents faced reluctant aides

December 3
Church settles with victim

November 15
Settlement fuels money advice

November 12
Claims set aside until 2004

October 30
Hard line set on abuse trials

October 21
Most plaintiffs accept deal

October 19
Therapy sought in abuse suit

October 17
Lawyer says settlement near

October 8
Victims agonize over deal

September 12
Victims seen taking settlement

September 11
Church deal a boon for lawyers

September 10
Church in $85 million accord
Archdiocese facing new strains
Most plaintiffs to accept deal
O'Malley makes an appeal

September 9
Negotiations resume in cases

Earlier stories

Search for:
Time period:

Spotlight Report

Therapy guarantee sought in abuse suit

By Anand Vaishnav, Globe Staff, 10/19/2003

Some alleged victims of clergy sexual abuse and their advocates say they plan to protest today outside Holy Cross Cathedral in the South End, because offers of therapy in the proposed settlement between them and the Boston Archdiocese are inadequate.

The group Survivors First asserts that statements promising therapy for abuse victims in the the proposed $85 million legal settlement are not binding.

The settlement states that victims who agree to the settlement "still shall be eligible to participate in the continued therapy and healing program offered by" the archdiocese. But Paul Baier, president of Survivors First, said yesterday that the clause is not ironclad because it refers to a therapy policy in the archdiocese that could be changed in the future.

The archdiocese offers abuse victims one hour of therapy once a week for six months, according to a policy posted on its website. Therapy can continue longer than six months after the victim's therapist submits a diagnosis and treatment plans to the church's Office of Pastoral Support and Outreach.

Baier said the rules should be included in the settlement. "Our concern is that we have seen in the past that church policy changes or gets selectively enforced," said Baier, whose group represents about 200 New England abuse victims and their advocates. "We'd like to see the policy they have now legally binding."

The Rev. Christopher J. Coyne, spokesman for the archdiocese, said the therapy provisions in the settlement are clear enough and that the church will continue to offer therapy to victims of clergy sexual abuse.

"We're committed to ongoing therapy," Coyne said. "Frankly, this has been an issue that Survivors First has been bringing up over and over and over again. We've constantly responded that we will provide the therapy."

Coyne pointed out that victims' lawyers deemed the therapy language in the settlement adequate or they would not have agreed to it. Claims can be evaluated once 80 percent of about 542 eligible victims agree to the settlement, and the deadline is Oct. 23.

Baier said his organization plans to file a friend-of-the-court brief tomorrow urging Suffolk Superior Court Judge Constance M. Sweeney, who is presiding over the claims, to amend the settlement to guarantee lifetime reimbursement for therapy and establish an independent review panel to ensure that therapy guidelines are being followed.


© Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Advertise | Contact us | Privacy policy