RadioBDC Logo
POMPEII | Bastille Listen Live
Ballot Questions | 3. Medical Marijuana
Summary
This proposed law would allow the medical use of marijuana by patients who have been diagnosed with a debilitating medical condition such as cancer, glaucoma, HIV-positive status or AIDS, hepatitis C, Crohn’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, ALS, or multiple sclerosis.

The patient would have to obtain a written certification from a physician with whom the patient has a bona fide physician-patient relationship. Patients could possess up to a 60-day supply of marijuana for their personal medical use.

Non-profit treatment centers could grow, process, and provide marijuana to patients if they register with the state Department of Public Health, pay a fee, and identify where the marijuana will be grown and stored in enclosed, locked facilities.

A center’s personnel would have to register with DPH, be at least 21 years old, and have no felony drug convictions. In 2013, there could be no more than 35 treatment centers, with no more than five centers in each county. In later years, DPH could modify the number of centers.

If a patient’s access to a treatment center is limited by financial or physical limitations, DPH could allow the patient or a registered caregiver to grow plants, in a closed, locked facility, for a 60-day supply of marijuana for the patient’s own use.

The sale, distribution, or trafficking of medical marijuana for profit could be punished by up to 5 years in state prison or by 2 1/2 half years in a house of correction.
Arguments
YES – ALLOW THE MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA
(Written by Linda Brantley, president, New England Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, Committee for Compassionate Medicine) http://www.compassionforpatients.com/

A YES vote will ease the suffering of thousands of people with cancer, Parkinson’s disease, Crohn’s disease, multiple sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, glaucoma, and other debilitating conditions.

Scientific research has proven that marijuana can be useful for many clinical applications, including pain relief, nausea, and seizures.

Provisions of the proposed law requiring strict regulation by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, written physician approval, a limited number of non-profit treatment centers, and criminal penalties for fraud will help ensure only appropriate medical use of marijuana.

This proposal has been endorsed by many patients, their families, medical professionals, and law enforcement officials who believe that a smart, science-based approach can help suffering patients without encouraging inappropriate drug use.

In fact, allowing the medical use of marijuana will lessen the need for dangerous narcotics like morphine and OxyContin.

On behalf of thousands of patients, we ask for your support.

These arguments, from the secretary of state's election website, were written by proponents and opponents of each question and reflect their opinions.

Boston.com, The Boston Globe, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts do not endorse these arguments, and do not certify the truth or accuracy of any statement made in these arguments.

The names of the individuals and organizations who wrote each argument, and any written comments by others about each argument, are on file in the secretary of state's office.
NO – DO NOT ALLOW THE MEDICAL USE OF MARIJUANA
(Written by Dr. Jay Broadhurst, Vote No on Question 3)
http://mavotenoonquestion3.com/


We all have compassion for those in pain, but the loopholes for corruption and exploitation are enormous.

If enacted, this law would allow:
> virtually anyone could grow pot in their backyard and carry a 60-day supply;
> anyone age 21 and over to operate a pot shop in your neighborhood to sell marijuana for any "medical" reason - not just for the seriously ill.

In Colorado, for example, less than 3% of patients suffer from cancer and HIV.

We do not need 35 pot shops to serve the less than 1% truly in need of medical marijuana in Massachusetts.

There is already a marijuana pill available for prescription (Marinol). Other marijuana medication will be available in pharmacies soon.

Medical marijuana needs tighter restriction and physician oversight. Let’s develop medications properly and find a better path for seriously ill patients, who should not be arrested.

Protect Massachusetts from widespread abuse. Vote no.

These arguments, from the secretary of state's election website, were written by proponents and opponents of each question and reflect their opinions.

Boston.com, The Boston Globe, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts do not endorse these arguments, and do not certify the truth or accuracy of any statement made in these arguments.

The names of the individuals and organizations who wrote each argument, and any written comments by others about each argument, are on file in the secretary of state's office.