US objects to Maliki's choice for top officer

BAGHDAD -- Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has filled the top military job in Baghdad with a virtually unknown Iraqi officer chosen over the objections of top US and Iraqi military commanders, according to officials from both governments.

Iraqi political figures said yesterday that Maliki also had failed to consult the leaders of other political factions before announcing the appointment of Lieutenant General Abud Qanbar.

The appointment is highly significant because it is Maliki's first public move after President Bush's announcement that he is sending more troops to Iraq. The prime mission for those troops would be an effort to reduce violence in Baghdad. As the Iraqi commander for the capital, Qanbar would play a central role in that campaign.

In his speech Wednesday in which he announced the troop increase, Bush said that political and sectarian interference in security matters no longer will be tolerated. "If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people," Bush said. "The prime minister understands this."

But Maliki's decision to push through his own choice for one of the country's most sensitive military posts -- and to reject another officer who was considered more qualified by the top US commander, General George W. Casey Jr. -- has renewed questions about the prime minister's intentions.

"It's a delicate situation," said Mahmoud Othman, a Kurdish lawmaker who questioned the choice of Qanbar. "It's very dangerous if it turns out that he has affiliations," he said, naming Maliki's political party and the anti-American cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.

US officials are skeptical of Qanbar not only because of the way he was chosen, but because they know little about him. Moreover, they have long questioned the degree to which Maliki's government is reliant on sectarian figures, particularly Sadr. Maliki essentially is asking American officials to take Qanbar on trust at a time when they have little left.

Qanbar, a commander in the navy during Saddam Hussein's reign, has not worked with American military officials, who say they know little about him other than that he hails from Amara, a city in the Shi'ite-dominated south, and that he was taken prisoner by American forces near Kuwait during the first Persian Gulf War.

US commanders have said publicly that officials in Maliki's government have intervened several times to block them from combating Sadr's al-Mahdi Army militia, which is accused of being behind much of the bloodshed in Baghdad. When US forces did raid the militia's stronghold of Sadr City, Maliki's government publicly criticized them. On several occasions, Maliki ordered the release of suspected militiamen captured in Sadr City, frustrating US commanders on the ground.

The question of whether to assault the militia directly and attack Sadr City, a vast Shi'ite neighborhood in eastern Baghdad, is one of the most vexing that now faces US forces in Iraq.

Publicly, US officials have insisted that the decision will be left to the Iraqi government. But privately, senior military officials say that new rules of engagement negotiated with the Iraqis would allow them to go into Sadr City and target individual insurgent and militia leaders. As the Iraqi commander, Qanbar could have advance knowledge of US operations. He would command 18 brigades of Iraqi security forces that are supposed to be deployed to work with the Americans.